Files
devclaw-gitea/lib/setup/llm-model-selector.ts
Lauren ten Hoor 6a99752e5f refactor: standardize level names across all roles (#195 phase 1)
Rename levels to use consistent industry-standard terminology:
- dev: medior → mid
- qa: reviewer → mid, tester → junior, add senior level
- architect: opus → senior, sonnet → junior

Add backward-compatible migration for projects.json and openclaw.json
config via level aliases in selectors and projects parser.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-15 17:01:16 +08:00

157 lines
4.7 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* llm-model-selector.ts — LLM-powered intelligent model selection.
*
* Uses an LLM to understand model capabilities and assign optimal models to DevClaw roles.
*/
import { runCommand } from "../run-command.js";
export type ModelAssignment = {
dev: {
junior: string;
mid: string;
senior: string;
};
qa: {
junior: string;
mid: string;
senior: string;
};
architect: {
junior: string;
senior: string;
};
};
/**
* Use an LLM to intelligently select and assign models to DevClaw roles.
*/
export async function selectModelsWithLLM(
availableModels: Array<{ model: string; provider: string }>,
sessionKey?: string,
): Promise<ModelAssignment | null> {
if (availableModels.length === 0) {
return null;
}
// If only one model, assign it to all roles
if (availableModels.length === 1) {
const model = availableModels[0].model;
return {
dev: { junior: model, mid: model, senior: model },
qa: { junior: model, mid: model, senior: model },
architect: { junior: model, senior: model },
};
}
// Create a prompt for the LLM
const modelList = availableModels.map((m) => m.model).join("\n");
const prompt = `You are an AI model expert. Analyze the following authenticated AI models and assign them to DevClaw development roles based on their capabilities.
Available models:
${modelList}
All roles use the same level scheme based on task complexity:
- **senior** (most capable): Complex architecture, refactoring, critical decisions
- **mid** (balanced): Features, bug fixes, code review, standard tasks
- **junior** (fast/efficient): Simple fixes, routine tasks
Rules:
1. Prefer same provider for consistency
2. Assign most capable model to senior
3. Assign mid-tier model to mid
4. Assign fastest/cheapest model to junior
5. Consider model version numbers (higher = newer/better)
6. Stable versions (no date) > snapshot versions (with date like 20250514)
Return ONLY a JSON object in this exact format (no markdown, no explanation):
{
"dev": {
"junior": "provider/model-name",
"mid": "provider/model-name",
"senior": "provider/model-name"
},
"qa": {
"junior": "provider/model-name",
"mid": "provider/model-name",
"senior": "provider/model-name"
},
"architect": {
"junior": "provider/model-name",
"senior": "provider/model-name"
}
}`;
try {
const sessionId = sessionKey ?? "devclaw-model-selection";
const result = await runCommand(
["openclaw", "agent", "--local", "--session-id", sessionId, "--message", prompt, "--json"],
{ timeoutMs: 30_000 },
);
const output = result.stdout.trim();
// Parse the response from openclaw agent --json
const lines = output.split("\n");
const jsonStartIndex = lines.findIndex((line) => line.trim().startsWith("{"));
if (jsonStartIndex === -1) {
throw new Error("No JSON found in LLM response");
}
const jsonString = lines.slice(jsonStartIndex).join("\n");
// openclaw agent --json returns: { payloads: [{ text: "```json\n{...}\n```" }], meta: {...} }
const response = JSON.parse(jsonString);
if (!response.payloads || !Array.isArray(response.payloads) || response.payloads.length === 0) {
throw new Error("Invalid openclaw agent response structure - missing payloads");
}
// Extract text from first payload
const textContent = response.payloads[0].text;
if (!textContent) {
throw new Error("Empty text content in openclaw agent payload");
}
// Strip markdown code blocks (```json and ```)
const cleanJson = textContent
.replace(/```json\n?/g, '')
.replace(/```\n?/g, '')
.trim();
// Parse the actual model assignment JSON
const assignment = JSON.parse(cleanJson);
// Log what we got for debugging
console.log("LLM returned:", JSON.stringify(assignment, null, 2));
// Validate the structure
// Backfill architect if LLM didn't return it (graceful upgrade)
if (!assignment.architect) {
assignment.architect = {
senior: assignment.dev?.senior ?? availableModels[0].model,
junior: assignment.dev?.mid ?? availableModels[0].model,
};
}
if (
!assignment.dev?.junior ||
!assignment.dev?.mid ||
!assignment.dev?.senior ||
!assignment.qa?.junior ||
!assignment.qa?.mid ||
!assignment.qa?.senior
) {
console.error("Invalid assignment structure. Got:", assignment);
throw new Error(`Invalid assignment structure from LLM. Missing fields in: ${JSON.stringify(Object.keys(assignment))}`);
}
return assignment as ModelAssignment;
} catch (err) {
console.error("LLM model selection failed:", (err as Error).message);
return null;
}
}