Files
devclaw-gitea/README.md
Claude 553efcc146 docs: overhaul documentation for consistency with implementation
Complete documentation rewrite to match the current codebase:

- README: add benefits section (process consistency, token savings with
  estimates, project isolation, continuous planning, feedback loops,
  role-based prompts, atomic operations, audit trail), task workflow
  with state diagram, model-to-role mapping tables, installation guide
- New TOOLS.md: complete reference for all 11 tools with parameters,
  behavior, and execution guards
- New CONFIGURATION.md: full config reference for openclaw.json,
  projects.json, heartbeat, notifications, workspace layout
- Fix tool names across all docs: task_pickup→work_start,
  task_complete→work_finish
- Fix tier model: QA has reviewer/tester levels, not flat "qa"
- Fix config schema: nested models.dev.*/models.qa.* structure
- Fix prompt path: projects/roles/ not projects/prompts/
- Fix worker state: uses "level" field not "model"/"tier"
- Fix MANAGEMENT.md: remove incorrect model references
- Fix TESTING.md: update model config example to nested structure
- Remove VERIFICATION.md (one-off checklist, no longer needed)
- Add cross-references between all docs pages

https://claude.ai/code/session_01R3rGevPY748gP4uK2ggYag
2026-02-10 20:13:22 +00:00

14 KiB

DevClaw Logo

DevClaw — Development Plugin for OpenClaw

Every group chat becomes an autonomous development team.

Add an agent to a Telegram/WhatsApp group, point it at a GitHub/GitLab repo — that group now has an orchestrator managing the backlog, a DEV worker writing code, and a QA worker reviewing it. All autonomous. Add another group, get another team. Each project runs in complete isolation with its own task queue, workers, and session state.

DevClaw is the OpenClaw plugin that makes this work.

Benefits

Process consistency

Every task follows the same fixed pipeline — Planning → To Do → Doing → To Test → Testing → Done — across every project. Label transitions, state updates, session dispatch, and audit logging happen atomically inside the plugin. The orchestrator agent cannot skip a step, forget a label, or corrupt session state. Hundreds of lines of manual orchestration logic collapse into a single work_start call.

Token savings

DevClaw reduces token consumption at three levels:

Mechanism How it works Estimated savings
Shared sessions Each developer level per role maintains one persistent session per project. When a medior dev finishes task A and picks up task B, the plugin reuses the existing session — no codebase re-reading. ~40-60% per task (~50K tokens saved per session reuse)
Tier selection Junior for typos (Haiku), medior for features (Sonnet), senior for architecture (Opus). The right model for the job means you're not burning Opus tokens on a CSS fix. ~30-50% on simple tasks vs. always using the largest model
Token-free heartbeat The heartbeat service runs every 60s doing health checks and queue dispatch using pure deterministic code + CLI calls. Zero LLM tokens consumed. Workers only use tokens when they actually process tasks. 100% savings on orchestration overhead

Project isolation and parallelization

Each project is fully isolated — separate task queue, separate worker state, separate sessions. No cross-project contamination. Two execution modes control parallelism:

  • Project-level: DEV and QA can work simultaneously on different tasks (parallel, default) or one role at a time (sequential)
  • Plugin-level: Multiple projects can have active workers at once (parallel, default) or only one project active at a time (sequential)

Continuous planning

The heartbeat service runs a continuous loop: health check → queue scan → dispatch. It detects stale workers (>2 hours), auto-reverts stuck labels, and fills free worker slots — all without human intervention or agent LLM tokens. The orchestrator agent only gets involved when a decision requires judgment.

Feedback loops

Three automated feedback loops keep the pipeline self-correcting:

  1. Auto-chaining — DEV "done" automatically dispatches QA. QA "fail" automatically re-dispatches DEV. No orchestrator action needed.
  2. Stale worker watchdog — Workers active >2 hours are auto-detected. Labels revert to queue, workers deactivated. Tasks available for retry.
  3. Completion enforcement — Every task message includes a mandatory work_finish section. Workers use "blocked" if stuck. Three-layer guarantee prevents tasks from getting stuck forever.

Role-based instruction prompts

Workers receive customizable, project-specific instructions loaded at dispatch time:

workspace/projects/roles/
├── my-webapp/
│   ├── dev.md     ← "Run npm test before committing. Deploy URL: ..."
│   └── qa.md      ← "Check OAuth flow. Verify mobile responsiveness."
└── default/
    ├── dev.md     ← Fallback for projects without custom instructions
    └── qa.md

Edit these files to inject deployment steps, test commands, acceptance criteria, or coding standards — per project, per role.

Atomic operations with rollback

Every tool call wraps multiple operations (label transition + state update + session dispatch + audit log) into a single atomic action. If session dispatch fails, the label transition is rolled back. No orphaned state. No half-completed operations.

Full audit trail

Every tool call automatically appends an NDJSON entry to log/audit.log. Query with jq to trace any task's full history. No manual logging required from the orchestrator.


The model-to-role mapping

DevClaw doesn't expose raw model names. You're assigning a junior developer to fix a typo, not configuring anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5. Each developer level maps to a configurable LLM:

DEV levels

Level Who they are Default model Assigns to
junior The intern anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 Typos, single-file fixes, CSS changes
medior The reliable mid-level anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5 Features, bug fixes, multi-file changes
senior The architect anthropic/claude-opus-4-5 Architecture, migrations, system-wide refactoring

QA levels

Level Who they are Default model Assigns to
reviewer The code reviewer anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5 Code review, test validation, PR inspection
tester The QA tester anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 Manual testing, smoke tests

The orchestrator LLM evaluates each issue and picks the appropriate level. A keyword-based heuristic in model-selector.ts serves as fallback when the orchestrator omits the level. Override which model powers each level in openclaw.json.


Task workflow

Every task (issue) moves through a fixed pipeline of label states. DevClaw tools handle every transition atomically.

stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> Planning
    Planning --> ToDo: Ready for development

    ToDo --> Doing: work_start (DEV) ⇄ blocked
    Doing --> ToTest: work_finish (DEV done)

    ToTest --> Testing: work_start (QA) / auto-chain ⇄ blocked
    Testing --> Done: work_finish (QA pass)
    Testing --> ToImprove: work_finish (QA fail)
    Testing --> Refining: work_finish (QA refine)

    ToImprove --> Doing: work_start (DEV fix) or auto-chain
    Refining --> ToDo: Human decision

    Done --> [*]

The eight state labels

Label Color Meaning
Planning Blue-grey Pre-work review — issue exists but not ready for development
To Do Blue Ready for DEV pickup
Doing Orange DEV actively working
To Test Cyan Ready for QA pickup
Testing Purple QA actively reviewing
Done Green Complete — issue closed
To Improve Red QA failed — back to DEV
Refining Yellow Awaiting human decision

Worker self-reporting

Workers call work_finish directly when they're done — no orchestrator involvement needed for the state transition. Workers can also call task_create to file follow-up issues they discover during work.

Auto-chaining

When a project has auto-chaining enabled:

  • DEV "done" → QA is dispatched immediately (using the reviewer level)
  • QA "fail" → DEV fix is dispatched immediately (reuses previous DEV level)
  • QA "pass" / "refine" / "blocked" → no chaining (pipeline done, needs human input, or returned to queue)
  • DEV "blocked" → no chaining (returned to queue for retry)

Completion enforcement

Three layers guarantee tasks never get stuck:

  1. Completion contract — Every task message includes a mandatory section requiring work_finish, even on failure. Workers use "blocked" if stuck.
  2. Blocked result — Both DEV and QA can gracefully put a task back in queue (Doing → To Do, Testing → To Test).
  3. Stale worker watchdog — Heartbeat detects workers active >2 hours and auto-reverts labels to queue.

Installation

Requirements

Requirement Why Verify
OpenClaw DevClaw is an OpenClaw plugin openclaw --version
Node.js >= 20 Plugin runtime node --version
gh or glab CLI Issue tracker provider (auto-detected from git remote) gh --version / glab --version
CLI authenticated Plugin calls gh/glab for every label transition gh auth status / glab auth status

Install the plugin

cp -r devclaw ~/.openclaw/extensions/

Verify:

openclaw plugins list
# Should show: DevClaw | devclaw | loaded

Run setup

Three options — pick one:

Option A: Conversational onboarding (recommended)

Call the onboard tool from any agent with DevClaw loaded. It walks through configuration step by step.

Option B: CLI wizard

openclaw devclaw setup

Option C: Non-interactive CLI

openclaw devclaw setup --new-agent "My Orchestrator"

Setup creates an agent, configures model tiers, writes workspace files (AGENTS.md, HEARTBEAT.md, role templates), and optionally binds a messaging channel.

Register a project

In the Telegram/WhatsApp group for the project:

"Register project my-app at ~/git/my-app with base branch main"

The agent calls project_register, which atomically creates all 8 state labels, scaffolds role instruction files, and adds the project to projects.json.

Start working

"Check the queue"           → agent calls status
"Pick up issue #1 for DEV"  → agent calls work_start
[DEV works autonomously]    → calls work_finish when done
[Heartbeat fills next slot] → QA dispatched automatically

See the Onboarding Guide for detailed step-by-step instructions.


How it works

graph TB
    subgraph "Group Chat A"
        direction TB
        A_O["Orchestrator"]
        A_GL[GitHub/GitLab Issues]
        A_DEV["DEV (worker session)"]
        A_QA["QA (worker session)"]
        A_O -->|work_start| A_GL
        A_O -->|dispatches| A_DEV
        A_O -->|dispatches| A_QA
    end

    subgraph "Group Chat B"
        direction TB
        B_O["Orchestrator"]
        B_GL[GitHub/GitLab Issues]
        B_DEV["DEV (worker session)"]
        B_QA["QA (worker session)"]
        B_O -->|work_start| B_GL
        B_O -->|dispatches| B_DEV
        B_O -->|dispatches| B_QA
    end

    AGENT["Single OpenClaw Agent"]
    AGENT --- A_O
    AGENT --- B_O

Same agent process — each group chat gives it a different project context. The orchestrator role, the workers, the task queue, and all state are fully isolated per group.


Session reuse

Worker sessions are expensive to start — each new spawn reads the full codebase (~50K tokens). DevClaw maintains separate sessions per level per role (session-per-level design). When a medior dev finishes task A and picks up task B on the same project, the plugin detects the existing session and sends the task directly.

The plugin handles session dispatch internally via OpenClaw CLI. The orchestrator agent never calls sessions_spawn or sessions_send — it calls work_start and the plugin does the rest.

sequenceDiagram
    participant O as Orchestrator
    participant DC as DevClaw Plugin
    participant IT as Issue Tracker
    participant S as Worker Session

    O->>DC: work_start({ issueId: 42, role: "dev" })
    DC->>IT: Fetch issue, verify label
    DC->>DC: Assign level (junior/medior/senior)
    DC->>DC: Check existing session for assigned level
    DC->>IT: Transition label (To Do → Doing)
    DC->>S: Dispatch task via CLI (create or reuse session)
    DC->>DC: Update projects.json, write audit log
    DC-->>O: { success: true, announcement: "..." }

Tools

DevClaw registers 11 tools, grouped by function:

Worker lifecycle

Tool Description
work_start Pick up a task — handles level assignment, label transition, session dispatch, audit
work_finish Complete a task — handles label transition, state update, auto-chaining, queue tick

Task management

Tool Description
task_create Create a new issue in the tracker
task_update Change an issue's state label manually
task_comment Add a comment to an issue

Operations

Tool Description
status Queue counts + worker state dashboard
health Worker health checks + zombie detection
work_heartbeat Manual trigger for health + queue dispatch

Setup

Tool Description
project_register One-time project setup (labels, prompts, state)
setup Agent + workspace initialization
onboard Conversational onboarding guide

See the Tools Reference for full parameters and usage.


Documentation

Document Description
Architecture System design, session-per-level model, data flow, component interactions
Tools Reference Complete reference for all 11 tools with parameters and examples
Configuration Full config reference — openclaw.json, projects.json, heartbeat, notifications
Onboarding Guide Step-by-step setup: install, configure, register projects, test the pipeline
QA Workflow QA process: review documentation, comment templates, enforcement
Context Awareness How DevClaw adapts behavior based on interaction context
Testing Guide Automated test suite: scenarios, fixtures, CI/CD integration
Management Theory The delegation theory behind DevClaw's design
Roadmap Planned features: configurable roles, channel-agnostic groups, Jira

License

MIT